Steve-O

    Are The Nude Pictures of Britney Real?

    Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 06:19 AM CST [General]

     

    Click here for more naughty pictures.

     A message from the owner of the website where the original pictures were posted...

    "I say this looks exactly like her, I'd be shocked if it was NOT her. The only reason I am cautious to say "100% positive proof"... is not finding the dark freckle on her left side stomach on any other pictures I have of her. The wrist tattoo matches... two tattoos very low on her stomach are not visible in the bathtub pictures because her legs are bent up... while she pleasures herself with the bath water."

    0 (0 Ratings)

    Sorry Steveo, that's not her.
    Her eyes are differn't, her ears are differn't, her nose is differn't, and her body is defiently NOT Britney's.
    Britney is a total hooker by showing off her body on her CD covers, and as you can see, she has no moles, at all.
    Of course there is a chance that they covered it up on photoshop or something.
    But seriously, if you look real hard into it and think about it you wouldn't think that's her.
    I don't exactly know about 'some Russian girl', but I am at least 90% positive that is not Britney.
    No worries, man.
    I respect other people's opinions, but when I first looked at this, on your homepage, I knew right away is wasn't Britney.

    Anyways, that's what I think.
    Stay cool.

    -Hannah

    Hannah
    July 01, 2008
    08:02 AM CST

    Are you on crack?! That looks nothing like Britney! Pretty sure her body is definately not that pale and disgusting!!

    ashley
    July 01, 2008
    09:33 AM CST

    sorry Steve, there is no way that this is her.

    Grumpy
    July 01, 2008
    09:18 PM CST

Blog Categories